* kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5
@ 2007-12-18 9:20 Yann Dupont
2007-12-18 12:32 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dupont @ 2007-12-18 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs; +Cc: Jacky Carimalo
Hello, we got a kernel oops, probably in xfs on a debian kernel.
This volume is on SAN + device mapper.
this is a 1 TB volume. It was in service for more than 2 ou 3 years.
There is a high humber of files on it, as this volume serves for a
rsyncd, where 200+ servers sync their root filesystem on it every day.
here is the oops :
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: XFS internal error
XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 1561 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller
0xffffffff881857b7
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel:
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff88183ec0>]
:xfs:xfs_free_ag_extent+0x19f/0x67f
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff881857b7>]
:xfs:xfs_free_extent+0xa9/0xc9
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff88192526>]
:xfs:xfs_bmap_finish+0xf0/0x169
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff881b0185>]
:xfs:xfs_itruncate_finish+0x172/0x2b3
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff881c9683>]
:xfs:xfs_inactive+0x22e/0x823
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8023e8a9>]
pagevec_lookup+0x17/0x1e
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8022a5b4>]
truncate_inode_pages_range+0x1b1/0x277
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff881d3146>]
:xfs:xfs_fs_clear_inode+0xa5/0xec
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8022177b>]
clear_inode+0xc5/0xf6
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8022dfa0>]
generic_delete_inode+0xde/0x143
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8020cc6b>] dput+0x135/0x153
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff802355c0>]
sys_renameat+0x19b/0x20a
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8020bee8>]
_atomic_dec_and_lock+0x39/0x57
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8022ba1e>]
mntput_no_expire+0x19/0x8b
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff8025d2a2>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0xa
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel:
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(dm-3,0x8) called
from line 4267 of file fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c. Return address =
0xffffffff88192563
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Filesystem "dm-3": Corruption of
in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem: dm-3
Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and
rectify the problem(s)
and the kernel :
inchgower:/var/log# uname -a
Linux inchgower 2.6.18-5-vserver-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 1 00:27:03 UTC
2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Please note that it is not the "generic" debian kernel, but the vserver
one - but stock etch version anyway. We had not seen any problems with
this combination, (xfs + debian kernel-vserver) which is very largely
deployed here. This is a first.
Do you think the problems is due to xfs or other factors ?
Sincerely,
--
Yann Dupont, Cri de l'université de Nantes
Tel: 02.51.12.53.91 - Fax: 02.51.12.58.60 - Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5
2007-12-18 9:20 kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5 Yann Dupont
@ 2007-12-18 12:32 ` David Chinner
2007-12-18 14:41 ` Yann Dupont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-12-18 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann Dupont; +Cc: xfs, Jacky Carimalo
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Yann Dupont wrote:
> Hello, we got a kernel oops, probably in xfs on a debian kernel.
>
> This volume is on SAN + device mapper.
> this is a 1 TB volume. It was in service for more than 2 ou 3 years.
> There is a high humber of files on it, as this volume serves for a
> rsyncd, where 200+ servers sync their root filesystem on it every day.
>
> here is the oops :
>
> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: XFS internal error
> XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 1561 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller
> 0xffffffff881857b7
> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel:
> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Call Trace:
> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff88183ec0>]
> :xfs:xfs_free_ag_extent+0x19f/0x67f
corrupted freespace btree. what does xfs_check tell you about the
filesystem on dm-3?
> Please note that it is not the "generic" debian kernel, but the vserver
> one - but stock etch version anyway. We had not seen any problems with
> this combination, (xfs + debian kernel-vserver) which is very largely
> deployed here. This is a first.
>
> Do you think the problems is due to xfs or other factors ?
Could be a hardware problem. Could be an XFs problem. Coul dbe a dm problem.
I really can't say from a shutdown message like this - all it tells us is
that a btree block was corrupted by something since the last time it was
checked....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5
2007-12-18 12:32 ` David Chinner
@ 2007-12-18 14:41 ` Yann Dupont
2007-12-19 0:38 ` Barry Naujok
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dupont @ 2007-12-18 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: xfs, Jacky Carimalo
David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Yann Dupont wrote:
>
>> Hello, we got a kernel oops, probably in xfs on a debian kernel.
>>
>> This volume is on SAN + device mapper.
>> this is a 1 TB volume. It was in service for more than 2 ou 3 years.
>> There is a high humber of files on it, as this volume serves for a
>> rsyncd, where 200+ servers sync their root filesystem on it every day.
>>
>> here is the oops :
>>
>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: XFS internal error
>> XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 1561 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller
>> 0xffffffff881857b7
>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel:
>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Call Trace:
>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff88183ec0>]
>> :xfs:xfs_free_ag_extent+0x19f/0x67f
>>
>
> corrupted freespace btree. what does xfs_check tell you about the
> filesystem on dm-3?
>
>
xfs_check tells me to run xfs_repair -L, the attempts to mount the FS
to clear the logs ending in kernel oops.
XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 281 of file
fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller 0xffffffff88182f74
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff881816ed>] :xfs:xfs_alloc_fixup_trees+0x2fa/0x30b
[<ffffffff88198822>] :xfs:xfs_btree_setbuf+0x1f/0x89
[<ffffffff88182f74>] :xfs:xfs_alloc_ag_vextent+0xbd4/0xf5e
[<ffffffff88183aa5>] :xfs:xfs_alloc_vextent+0x2ce/0x401
[<ffffffff88191a70>] :xfs:xfs_bmapi+0x1068/0x1c85
[<ffffffff881c85f2>] :xfs:kmem_zone_alloc+0x56/0xa3
[<ffffffff8819ca78>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_grow_inode+0xca/0x2d4
[<ffffffff8819d8df>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_sf_to_block+0xad/0x5ba
[<ffffffff881b001b>] :xfs:xfs_inode_item_init+0x1e/0x7a
[<ffffffff881a4348>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_sf_addname+0x19d/0x4cf
[<ffffffff8819d43e>] :xfs:xfs_dir_createname+0xc4/0x134
[<ffffffff881c865d>] :xfs:kmem_zone_zalloc+0x1e/0x2f
[<ffffffff881b001b>] :xfs:xfs_inode_item_init+0x1e/0x7a
[<ffffffff881c6065>] :xfs:xfs_create+0x39d/0x5dd
[<ffffffff881ce702>] :xfs:xfs_vn_mknod+0x1bd/0x3c8inchgower:~# strace
-fp 7885
Process 17194 attached with 6 threads - interrupt to quit
[<ffffffff80220a18>] __up_read+0x13/0x8a
[<ffffffff881aa75e>] :xfs:xfs_iunlock+0x57/0x79
[<ffffffff881c3392>] :xfs:xfs_access+0x3d/0x46
[<ffffffff8819d112>] :xfs:xfs_dir_lookup+0xa2/0x122
[<ffffffff8020e0c5>] link_path_walk+0xd3/0xe5
[<ffffffff80239138>] vfs_create+0xe7/0x12c
[<ffffffff80219430>] open_namei+0x18c/0x6a0
[<ffffffff881cc5bb>] :xfs:xfs_file_open+0x27/0x2c
[<ffffffff80225d1d>] do_filp_open+0x1c/0x3d
[<ffffffff802180e0>] do_sys_open+0x44/0xc5
[<ffffffff8025d2a2>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0xa
Filesystem "dm-1": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of
file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff881c6253
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff881bdeac>] :xfs:xfs_trans_cancel+0x5b/0xfe
[<ffffffff881c6253>] :xfs:xfs_create+0x58b/0x5dd
[<ffffffff881ce702>] :xfs:xfs_vn_mknod+0x1bd/0x3c8
[<ffffffff80220a18>] __up_read+0x13/0x8a
[<ffffffff881aa75e>] :xfs:xfs_iunlock+0x57/0x79
[<ffffffff881c3392>] :xfs:xfs_access+0x3d/0x46
[<ffffffff8819d112>] :xfs:xfs_dir_lookup+0xa2/0x122
[<ffffffff8020e0c5>] link_path_walk+0xd3/0xe5
[<ffffffff80239138>] vfs_create+0xe7/0x12c
[<ffffffff80219430>] open_namei+0x18c/0x6a0
[<ffffffff881cc5bb>] :xfs:xfs_file_open+0x27/0x2c
[<ffffffff80225d1d>] do_filp_open+0x1c/0x3d
[<ffffffff802180e0>] do_sys_open+0x44/0xc5
[<ffffffff8025d2a2>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0xa
I've been upgrading the xfs_repair to last version available on debian
(xfs_repair version 2.9.4)
There are lots of errors reported
(don't have the beginning on the console)
...
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749351
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749352
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749353
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749354
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749355
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749356
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749357
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749358
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749359
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749360
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749361
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749362
data fork in ino 3628932549 claims free block 226749363
imap claims a free inode 3629547632 is in use, correcting imap and
clearing inode
- agno = 28
- agno = 29
data fork in ino 3894217924 claims free block 243388605
data fork in ino 3894217924 claims free block 243388606
data fork in ino 3899211601 claims free block 243702250
data fork in ino 3899211601 claims free block 243702251
data fork in ino 3899211601 claims free block 243702252
data fork in ino 3907562994 claims free block 244222632
data fork in ino 3907562994 claims free block 244222633
data fork in ino 3907562994 claims free block 244222634
data fork in ino 3907562994 claims free block 244222635
data fork in ino 3907562994 claims free block 244222636
data fork in ino 3910289697 claims free block 244393117
data fork in ino 3910289697 claims free block 244393118
data fork in ino 3910289699 claims free block 244393113
....
and in the end :
- agno = 31
correcting imap
correcting imap
correcting imap
correcting imap
correcting imap
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
)
And now the process seems stuck.
There is no activity on the san disk ;
a ps show this :
root 7885 6466 7885 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 09:55 pts/0
00:00:19 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
root 7885 6466 17190 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
root 7885 6466 17191 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
root 7885 6466 17192 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
root 7885 6466 17193 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
root 7885 6466 17194 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
and a strace this :
inchgower:~# strace -fp 7885
Process 17194 attached with 6 threads - interrupt to quit
[pid 17191] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
[pid 17192] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
[pid 17193] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
[pid 17194] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
[pid 17190] futex(0x67e4f8, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL
Can I stop the process and start another version without risking problems ?
> Could be a hardware problem. Could be an XFs problem. Coul dbe a dm problem.
> I really can't say from a shutdown message like this - all it tells us is
> that a btree block was corrupted by something since the last time it was
> checked....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
OK,
cheers,
--
Yann Dupont, Cri de l'université de Nantes
Tel: 02.51.12.53.91 - Fax: 02.51.12.58.60 - Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5
2007-12-18 14:41 ` Yann Dupont
@ 2007-12-19 0:38 ` Barry Naujok
2007-12-19 10:27 ` Yann Dupont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Barry Naujok @ 2007-12-19 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann Dupont, David Chinner; +Cc: xfs, Jacky Carimalo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:41:36 +1100, Yann Dupont
<Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr> wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Yann Dupont wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, we got a kernel oops, probably in xfs on a debian kernel.
>>>
>>> This volume is on SAN + device mapper.
>>> this is a 1 TB volume. It was in service for more than 2 ou 3 years.
>>> There is a high humber of files on it, as this volume serves for a
>>> rsyncd, where 200+ servers sync their root filesystem on it every day.
>>>
>>> here is the oops :
>>>
>>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: XFS internal error
>>> XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 1561 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c.
>>> Caller
>>> 0xffffffff881857b7
>>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel:
>>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: Call Trace:
>>> Dec 16 23:27:32 inchgower kernel: [<ffffffff88183ec0>]
>>> :xfs:xfs_free_ag_extent+0x19f/0x67f
>>>
>>
>> corrupted freespace btree. what does xfs_check tell you about the
>> filesystem on dm-3?
>>
>>
> xfs_check tells me to run xfs_repair -L, the attempts to mount the FS
> to clear the logs ending in kernel oops.
[snip]
> Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
> - setting up duplicate extent list...
> - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
> - agno = 0
>
> )
>
> And now the process seems stuck.
> There is no activity on the san disk ;
>
> a ps show this :
>
> root 7885 6466 7885 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 09:55 pts/0
> 00:00:19 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
> root 7885 6466 17190 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
> 00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
> root 7885 6466 17191 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
> 00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
> root 7885 6466 17192 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
> 00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
> root 7885 6466 17193 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
> 00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
> root 7885 6466 17194 0 6 1447133 5660020 6 10:16 pts/0
> 00:00:00 xfs_repair -L /dev/evms/DATAXFS2
>
>
> and a strace this :
> inchgower:~# strace -fp 7885
> Process 17194 attached with 6 threads - interrupt to quit
> [pid 17191] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
> [pid 17192] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
> [pid 17193] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
> [pid 17194] futex(0x2aab3c8fa884, FUTEX_WAIT, 44, NULL <unfinished ...>
> [pid 17190] futex(0x67e4f8, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL
>
> Can I stop the process and start another version without risking
> problems ?
Yes, you can stop and restart. In your scenario, run xfs_repair -P to
disable prefetch which is getting stuck.
Barry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5
2007-12-19 0:38 ` Barry Naujok
@ 2007-12-19 10:27 ` Yann Dupont
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dupont @ 2007-12-19 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Naujok; +Cc: David Chinner, xfs, Jacky Carimalo
Barry Naujok wrote:
>
>>
>> Can I stop the process and start another version without risking
>> problems ?
>
> Yes, you can stop and restart. In your scenario, run xfs_repair -P to
> disable prefetch which is getting stuck.
>
> Barry.
>
>
>
Thanks for the tip, xfs_repair -P did the job.
Only minimal problems found :
(9856 K in lost+found for a 1 TB volume)
inchgower:/var/lib/vservers/VS_Archive/Archive/lost+found# ls -al
total 9860
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-12-19 10:28 .
drwxr-xr-x 32 root root 4096 2007-12-04 16:26 ..
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 2007-12-16 19:33 1311409765
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 4992 2007-11-13 11:47 1388664851
-rwx------ 1 root root 4643 2007-09-27 15:51 1388664852
-rw------- 1 ntp 104 369 2007-12-16 22:36 1624155084
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 2007-12-16 22:03 17043457
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8358 2005-05-10 21:54 1810860709
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7644 2005-05-10 21:54 1818650492
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45620 2005-05-10 21:54 1818650493
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5304 2005-05-10 21:54 1818840419
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5034 2005-05-10 21:54 1818841748
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1300 2005-05-10 21:54 1818842113
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6040 2005-05-10 21:54 1818842115
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4008 2005-05-10 21:54 1818842134
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4019 2005-05-10 21:54 1818873357
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 732 2007-12-14 15:24 1900698499
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1060 2007-02-21 18:48 2041002887
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 152 2005-11-10 17:09 2041002903
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 0 2007-12-15 23:33 2153644053
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 0 2007-12-15 23:33 2158002845
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-12-16 22:03 2572244357
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 75 2007-12-16 23:27 268556858
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 6 2007-12-16 23:27 268556859
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-12-16 19:33 273918729
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1193201 2007-12-16 16:06 3223675010
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 2007-12-16 19:33 3226075506
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22451 2007-12-16 16:07 3226075507
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 19211 2007-12-14 11:22 3361035798
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 1265 2007-12-14 17:58 3628814835
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 0 2007-12-15 22:00 3910289706
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 19211 2007-12-14 13:57 4055379312
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 14360 2007-12-14 17:58 4055415347
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 14346 2007-12-10 18:01 4055415352
-rwx------ 1 root www-data 19225 2007-12-14 17:58 4055415353
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 19 2007-12-16 23:27 4160831758
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 20 2007-12-16 23:27 4160831759
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 6 2005-09-15 11:44 4160831760
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1387921 2007-11-05 02:02 620696741
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4715935 2007-11-06 02:02 620696742
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1389488 2007-11-07 02:02 620696743
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1193251 2007-12-16 20:49 633648296
as you can see, some entries on lost+found are from 2005-05-10
(we had some bad power fault at that time), so maybe the corruption was
there since a very long time.
Cheers,
--
Yann Dupont, Cri de l'université de Nantes
Tel: 02.51.12.53.91 - Fax: 02.51.12.58.60 - Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-19 10:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-18 9:20 kernel oops on debian , 2.6.18-5 Yann Dupont
2007-12-18 12:32 ` David Chinner
2007-12-18 14:41 ` Yann Dupont
2007-12-19 0:38 ` Barry Naujok
2007-12-19 10:27 ` Yann Dupont
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox