From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0EEgvGZ005222 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:42:58 -0800 Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8566511CC1A7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (enyo.dsw2k3.info [195.71.86.239]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iKQgFKdK6yKO09D7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:43:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:43:06 +0100 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Subject: ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync Message-ID: <20080114144306.GA4672@citd.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Gopala Krishna Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 14.01.2008 17:44, Gopala Krishna wrote: > Hi, > I am seeing some strange problem with XFS and would like to know the > expected behavior and if it is faulty is there any patches to resolve the > problem. > > Problem: > ====== ... The man-page "xfs_freeze" at least reads like it does what you want, i.e. it flushes everything(tm). Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.