From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0GLHObJ002364 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:17:25 -0800 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 80ACBC676DB for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (mondschein.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id IAiUlFGtcokag4Mu for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:17:34 +0100 References: <478DEFF0.40004@sgi.com> (sfid-20080116_130938_790120_481702E4) In-Reply-To: <478DEFF0.40004@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801162217.35594.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: markgw@sgi.com Cc: Gopala Krishna , Christoph Hellwig , Chris Wedgwood , nscott@aconex.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Am Mittwoch 16 Januar 2008 schrieb Mark Goodwin: > Gopala, > > it sounds like you want something like NDMP. Check that out first. Is there an open source implementation available for this protocol? Would be interesting to know. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7