From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m176dYY7029619 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:39:37 -0800 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:39:29 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: unpushed 4-month-old mods? Message-ID: <20080207063929.GA31513@infradead.org> References: <47A694F3.9010307@sandeen.net> <20080204044611.GF155407@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080204044611.GF155407@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:46:11PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:30:43PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > At least these three mods which I did back in September to get Fedora 8 > > / 2.6.23 into shape on 4k stacks, and a bugfix, are still not pushed to > > kernel.org, and are missing in 2.6.24... > > > > Is there any reason for the holdup? Makes me wonder what else isn't > > pushed... > > The holdup is that we drew a line in the sand for the 2.6.24 before > 2.6.23 was released. We did this because of the massive amount of invasive > change we already had queued up for 2.6.24. All those mods that got > held up will be pushed into 2.6.25 release. For which it's getting about time. The merge window started about with LCA, so by the tradition 2 weeks rule it'll close by the end of the week..