* [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done()
@ 2008-02-07 4:19 Lachlan McIlroy
2008-02-07 7:20 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lachlan McIlroy @ 2008-02-07 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-dev, xfs-oss
On a forced shutdown, xfs_finish_reclaim() will skip flushing the inode.
If the inode flush lock is not already held and there is an outstanding
xfs_iflush_done() then we might free the inode prematurely. By acquiring
and releasing the flush lock we will synchronise with xfs_iflush_done().
Lachlan
--- fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c_1.727 2008-01-10 16:00:48.000000000 +1100
+++ fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2008-02-07 15:15:26.000000000 +1100
@@ -3721,12 +3721,12 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
* We get the flush lock regardless, though, just to make sure
* we don't free it while it is being flushed.
*/
- if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
- if (!locked) {
- xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_iflock(ip);
- }
+ if (!locked) {
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iflock(ip);
+ }
+ if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
if (ip->i_update_core ||
((ip->i_itemp != NULL) &&
(ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields != 0))) {
@@ -3746,17 +3746,11 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
ASSERT(ip->i_update_core == 0);
ASSERT(ip->i_itemp == NULL ||
ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields == 0);
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- } else if (locked) {
- /*
- * We are not interested in doing an iflush if we're
- * in the process of shutting down the filesystem forcibly.
- * So, just reclaim the inode.
- */
- xfs_ifunlock(ip);
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
}
+ xfs_ifunlock(ip);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+
reclaim:
xfs_ireclaim(ip);
return 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done()
2008-02-07 4:19 [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done() Lachlan McIlroy
@ 2008-02-07 7:20 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2008-02-07 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lachlan McIlroy; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs-oss
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:19:49PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> On a forced shutdown, xfs_finish_reclaim() will skip flushing the inode.
> If the inode flush lock is not already held and there is an outstanding
> xfs_iflush_done() then we might free the inode prematurely. By acquiring
> and releasing the flush lock we will synchronise with xfs_iflush_done().
Looks fine.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-07 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-07 4:19 [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done() Lachlan McIlroy
2008-02-07 7:20 ` David Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox