From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m1J0Ki2I013389 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:20:46 -0800 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:20:59 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. Message-ID: <20080219002059.GX155407@sgi.com> References: <20080216074019.GV155407@sgi.com> <20080217230645.GY155407@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Jan Derfinak Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:04:35AM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Jan Derfinak wrote: > > > > with dd and rm'ing a subset of the files before unmounting? > > > I've run some simple tests this morning that do this, and I > > > don't see any issues. I'd like to confirm that simple cases > > > > Did you use x86_64 and latest CVS kernel? > > I have run the mount,umount test on x86 architecture with the same kernel > source version. Kernel image is of course different, it is different > computer. > On x86 everything is ok. > I guess that problem is in 64-bit architecture. Is it possible? The output I showed you was from an ia64 machine, so it's not purely 64bit related. Can you rebuild you x86_64 kernel from the same kernel tree you built the ia32 (make mrproper; make ....) and reinstall it and see if the still exists? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group