From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m1R0tUta017615 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:55:33 -0800 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:55:46 +1100 From: Niv Sardi Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill t_sema member of struct xfs_trans Message-ID: <20080227005546.GA77525841@sgi.com> References: <20080207082724.GA14119@lst.de> <20080226175758.GA13162@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080226175758.GA13162@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com * Christoph Hellwig [2008-02-26 18:57:58 +0100]: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:27:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > It's completely unused so we might aswell kill it. Note that there is > > another t_sema in struct xlog_ticket, which is used and actually an sv_t > > despite the name. That one is left untouched by this patch. > > Ping? This seems to be already applied in our dev tree, I'm trying to track down how/when/by-who, appart from that I'm all for pushing it. Cheers, -- Niv