From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m1SIHKMQ001341 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:17:23 -0800 Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:17:43 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [RFC, patch 1/2] Allow up to 1GB logs in mkfs.xfs Message-ID: <20080228181743.GX155259@sgi.com> References: <20080221230833.GG155407@sgi.com> <20080222050301.GP155407@sgi.com> <47BE6122.5040007@sgi.com> <20080222065338.GQ155407@sgi.com> <47C21585.8030504@sgi.com> <47C21A67.1010706@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C21A67.1010706@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: markgw@sgi.com, David Chinner , Niv Sardi , xfs-dev , xfs-oss On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:31:19PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Does a larger on-disk log mean we can have a lot more items in the AIL? Yes. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group