From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:41:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m22AfVUq018701 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:41:32 -0800 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 05:41:53 -0500 From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs Message-ID: <20080302104153.GD2483@josefsipek.net> References: <87ir05h16o.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ir05h16o.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Andi Kleen Cc: Barry Naujok , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:26:07AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > "Barry Naujok" writes: > > > > Lazy counters will default to on again in xfsprogs 2.10.0 (when CI > > support is released). > > CI is what? Case-insensitivity aka. case-folding. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Bad pun of the week: The formula 1 control computer suffered from a race condition