public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* can I shrink an xfs?
@ 2008-03-11 17:29 Louis-David Mitterrand
  2008-03-11 17:47 ` Eric Sandeen
  2008-03-11 18:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Louis-David Mitterrand @ 2008-03-11 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs

Hi,

Is it possible to shrink an xfs? I tried using xfs_growfs to no avail.

	zenon:~# xfs_growfs -D 650000000 /backup
	meta-data=/dev/md2               isize=256    agcount=32, agsize=20539552 blks
			 =                       sectsz=4096  attr=1
	data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=657265248, imaxpct=25
			 =                       sunit=16     swidth=48 blks
	naming   =version 2              bsize=4096  
	log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
			 =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=0
	realtime =none                   extsz=196608 blocks=0, rtextents=0
	data size 650000000 too small, old size is 657265248

... even though the fs is 80% full only.

Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: can I shrink an xfs?
  2008-03-11 17:29 can I shrink an xfs? Louis-David Mitterrand
@ 2008-03-11 17:47 ` Eric Sandeen
  2008-03-11 18:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2008-03-11 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs

Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is it possible to shrink an xfs? I tried using xfs_growfs to no avail.

Nope.

 http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#resize

-Eric

> 	zenon:~# xfs_growfs -D 650000000 /backup
> 	meta-data=/dev/md2               isize=256    agcount=32, agsize=20539552 blks
> 			 =                       sectsz=4096  attr=1
> 	data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=657265248, imaxpct=25
> 			 =                       sunit=16     swidth=48 blks
> 	naming   =version 2              bsize=4096  
> 	log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
> 			 =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=0
> 	realtime =none                   extsz=196608 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> 	data size 650000000 too small, old size is 657265248
> 
> ... even though the fs is 80% full only.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: can I shrink an xfs?
  2008-03-11 17:29 can I shrink an xfs? Louis-David Mitterrand
  2008-03-11 17:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2008-03-11 18:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
  2008-03-12  9:17   ` David Chinner
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek @ 2008-03-11 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:29:58PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is it possible to shrink an xfs? I tried using xfs_growfs to no avail.
 
There's no official/supported way to do it. There might be some tool to do
it, but I'm not aware of any.

Dave, et. al.: why not support shrinking? I know, inode numbers and whatnot,
but that's already being messed up (at least to a degree) with the noikeep
mount option. I think that shrinking would be useful to have - even if you
have to pass it --i-know-what-i-am-doing kind of option. Maybe a offline
shrink via repair would be more viable?

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

-- 
Hegh QaQ law'
quvHa'ghach QaQ puS

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: can I shrink an xfs?
  2008-03-11 18:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
@ 2008-03-12  9:17   ` David Chinner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2008-03-12  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek; +Cc: xfs, ruben.porras

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 02:02:10PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:29:58PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is it possible to shrink an xfs? I tried using xfs_growfs to no avail.
>  
> There's no official/supported way to do it. There might be some tool to do
> it, but I'm not aware of any.
> 
> Dave, et. al.: why not support shrinking? I know, inode numbers and whatnot,
> but that's already being messed up (at least to a degree) with the noikeep
> mount option. I think that shrinking would be useful to have - even if you
> have to pass it --i-know-what-i-am-doing kind of option. Maybe a offline
> shrink via repair would be more viable?

It's being worked on - have a look in the achives at what Ruben Porras has
been doing (and the patches he recently sent). Shrinking involves a lot of
bits to come together sucessful, and we're slowly getting them together.
If you want to get it done faster - help Ruben ;)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-12  9:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-11 17:29 can I shrink an xfs? Louis-David Mitterrand
2008-03-11 17:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-03-11 18:02 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2008-03-12  9:17   ` David Chinner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox