* new xfsqa mismatches
@ 2008-04-07 10:01 Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-07 21:55 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-04-07 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
103:
- output mismatch (see 103.out.bad)
7c7
< ln: creating symbolic link `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/target' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source': Operation not permitted
---
> ln: creating symbolic link `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/target' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source': Operation not permitted
not sure where the double to comes from but we should catch it
130 and 132 expetect Bytes in various places but get bytes from xfs_io
from CVS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: new xfsqa mismatches
2008-04-07 10:01 new xfsqa mismatches Christoph Hellwig
@ 2008-04-07 21:55 ` David Chinner
2008-04-08 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2008-04-07 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:01:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 103:
>
> - output mismatch (see 103.out.bad)
> 7c7
> < ln: creating symbolic link `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/target' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source': Operation not permitted
> ---
> > ln: creating symbolic link `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/target' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source' to `SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/source': Operation not permitted
>
> not sure where the double to comes from but we should catch it
>From the last fix that I did to fix this for new version of ln.
If other ppl sent xfsqa patches to the oss list, then you'd see that
a patch to fix this was sent out for review yesterday....
> 130 and 132 expetect Bytes in various places but get bytes from xfs_io
> from CVS
What's the error output? I've not seen that one....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: new xfsqa mismatches
2008-04-07 21:55 ` David Chinner
@ 2008-04-08 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-04-08 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:55:39AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> If other ppl sent xfsqa patches to the oss list, then you'd see that
> a patch to fix this was sent out for review yesterday....
Seen the commit now, but yes folks please send more patches to the list
for review!
> > 130 and 132 expetect Bytes in various places but get bytes from xfs_io
> > from CVS
>
> What's the error output? I've not seen that one....
130 [ 72.086853] XFS mounting filesystem hdd
- output mismatch (see 130.out.bad)
20c20
< XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
---
> 3 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec)
24c24
< XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
---
> 1000.000000 bytes, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec)
and so one for lots of lines
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-08 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-07 10:01 new xfsqa mismatches Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-07 21:55 ` David Chinner
2008-04-08 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox