From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m38B0bMP002696 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:00:39 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:41:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: new xfsqa mismatches Message-ID: <20080408104152.GA23535@lst.de> References: <20080407100140.GA11891@lst.de> <20080407215539.GC108924158@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080407215539.GC108924158@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:55:39AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > If other ppl sent xfsqa patches to the oss list, then you'd see that > a patch to fix this was sent out for review yesterday.... Seen the commit now, but yes folks please send more patches to the list for review! > > 130 and 132 expetect Bytes in various places but get bytes from xfs_io > > from CVS > > What's the error output? I've not seen that one.... 130 [ 72.086853] XFS mounting filesystem hdd - output mismatch (see 130.out.bad) 20c20 < XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) --- > 3 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec) 24c24 < XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) --- > 1000.000000 bytes, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec) and so one for lots of lines