From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: iget behaviour in xlog_recover_process_iunlinks
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:04:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410190453.GA8083@lst.de> (raw)
shouldn't we call xfs_iget with the XFS_IGET_CREATE flag here?
the code seems to be perfectly happy with zero-ed out inodes as long as
di_next_unlinked is valid.
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 19:04 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-04-11 2:14 ` iget behaviour in xlog_recover_process_iunlinks Timothy Shimmin
2008-04-11 2:44 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080410190453.GA8083@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox