* [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro
@ 2008-04-11 7:28 Donald Douwsma
2008-04-11 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Donald Douwsma @ 2008-04-11 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Still more 2.4 build remnants to get rid of...
HAVE_SPLICE was part of the infrastructure for building 2.4 and 2.6
kernels out of the same tree. Now we don't build 2.4 kernels this
way anymore its unused.
Signed-off-by: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@sgi.com>
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2008-04-08 13:23:55.000000000 +1000
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2008-04-08 12:09:22.455341741 +1000
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@
/*
* Feature macros (disable/enable)
*/
-#define HAVE_SPLICE /* a splice(2) exists in 2.6, but not in 2.4 */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define HAVE_PERCPU_SB /* per cpu superblock counters are a 2.6 feature */
#else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro
2008-04-11 7:28 [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro Donald Douwsma
@ 2008-04-11 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-04-11 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Donald Douwsma; +Cc: xfs
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:28:32PM +1000, Donald Douwsma wrote:
> Still more 2.4 build remnants to get rid of...
>
> HAVE_SPLICE was part of the infrastructure for building 2.4 and 2.6
> kernels out of the same tree. Now we don't build 2.4 kernels this
> way anymore its unused.
Looks good.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-11 7:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-11 7:28 [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro Donald Douwsma
2008-04-11 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox