From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3L67vOl006066 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:08:00 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:08:36 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 976035 - kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_rename Message-ID: <20080421060836.GA31296@infradead.org> References: <20080421052419.E52E458C4C15@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080421052419.E52E458C4C15@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Any reason you didn't commit: [PATCH 1/2] kill parent == child checks in xfs_remove and xfs_rmdir [PATCH 2/2] kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_remove and xfs_rmdir in this round, it's pretty much the equivalent treatment to remove and rmdir that we did to rename in this and the previous patch.