public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Michael Darling <darlingm@gmail.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:33:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080424053358.GW103491721@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4810062F.50100@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:01:51PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Michael Darling wrote:
> > I am preparing a new server, and benchmarking EXT3 against XFS, both using
> > software RAID and hardware RAID using a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML.
> > 
> > Using bonnie++ as a benchmark, I am seeing significant performance boosts in
> > my block sequential reads and writes moving from EXT3 to XFS.  I am aware
> > that XFS won't create and delete files as quickly as EXT3, however I am
> > seeing drops from 29455/second to 1957/second using software RAID, and from
> > 32524/second to 189/second using hardware RAID.  I'm not sure if when using
> > software raid, if creating and deleting files should drop to 6.6% of EXT3.
> > But, what I'm pretty sure of, is when using hardware raid, that creating and
> > deleting files shouldn't drop to 0.6% of EXT3.
> 
> So I played with this a little on 2.6.25, on plain partitions.
> 
> I saw similar numbers; for example, sequential creates:
> 
> ext3:		23698/s
> xfs:		  319/s
> xfs,nobarrier:	 4478/s

And with logbsize=256k?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-24  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-24  1:48 XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid) Michael Darling
2008-04-24  4:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24  5:33   ` David Chinner [this message]
2008-04-24  6:23     ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24  6:31       ` David Chinner
2008-04-24 15:39         ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24 12:49       ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 14:20         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-04-24 14:57           ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 17:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-25 14:54   ` Michael Darling
2008-04-26 15:23 ` Emmanuel Florac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080424053358.GW103491721@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=darlingm@gmail.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox