From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m3OJiHhC022795 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:44:25 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 38E2615D37AD for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id w7z6tqgrzaZPrBP8 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:44:57 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24 Message-ID: <20080424194457.GA22805@infradead.org> References: <20080424173626.bcd088e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Status of my local build tests will be at > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next. If maintainers want to give > > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add > > more builds. > > For the second day in a row, m68k builds failed because of > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c:527: error: implicit declaration of function 'xfs_icsb_sync_counters_locked' > make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.o] Error 1 Eric already submitted a patch on the xfs list, that should make it to the tree ASAP.