From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_page_state_convert()
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:23:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080427232317.GB103491721@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804270246.58828.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:46:58AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> This patch reduces xfs_page_state_convert() stack usage by 16 bytes
> by eliminating some local variables, and reducing the size
> of scope for other locals.
>
> Compile tested only.
Can you start testing your patches? if you are touching the writeback
or allocator path, there's a pretty high barrier to having patches
excepted, and testing them before is one of them. Go and download the
XFSQA suite from the xfs-cmds CVS tree on oss.sgi.com, and run your
patches through it....
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
>
> P.S.
>
> xfs_page_state_convert() carries the following comment:
> * Calling this without startio set means we are being asked to make a dirty
> * page ready for freeing it's buffers. When called with startio set then
> * we are coming from writepage.
> which leads to the following proposal: reimplement it as two
> functions, one which work as if startio parameter == 0
> and the other as if startio == 1.
> This will result in a bit of code duplication, but reduces
> stack usage on writepage path and allows for these two functions
> to have more descriptive names. (Presently the meaning of this
> function needs to be explained in that comment -> function
> name is not descriptive enough, because it does different things
> depending on startio value).
>
> Do you like this idea?
No. That code is complex enough with only one copy of it around. I don't
want two copies that differ subtly and hence have two different sets
of nasty, rarely hit corner cases in them.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-27 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 0:46 [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_page_state_convert() Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-27 23:23 ` David Chinner [this message]
2008-04-27 23:48 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-28 2:37 ` David Chinner
2008-04-28 3:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 3:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 22:22 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080427232317.GB103491721@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox