From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>,
xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero V2
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:20:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428062032.GI103491721@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428055922.GD3192@infradead.org>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:59:22AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:11:20PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > Ok, so is random32() good enough or does it need to be get_random_int()?
>
> I'm not sure offhand what random32 actually is, but a not
> cryptographically strong random number should be enough.
>From lib/random32.c:
This is a maximally equidistributed combined Tausworthe generator
based on code from GNU Scientific Library 1.5 (30 Jun 2004)
x_n = (s1_n ^ s2_n ^ s3_n)
s1_{n+1} = (((s1_n & 4294967294) <<12) ^ (((s1_n <<13) ^ s1_n) >>19))
s2_{n+1} = (((s2_n & 4294967288) << 4) ^ (((s2_n << 2) ^ s2_n) >>25))
s3_{n+1} = (((s3_n & 4294967280) <<17) ^ (((s3_n << 3) ^ s3_n) >>11))
The period of this generator is about 2^88.
From: P. L'Ecuyer, "Maximally Equidistributed Combined Tausworthe
Generators", Mathematics of Computation, 65, 213 (1996), 203--213.
-----
And uses per-cpu state to for the next number. Should be good enough.
Patch below.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
---
Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero
When we allocation new inode chunks, we initialise the generation
numbers to zero. This works fine until we delete a chunk and then
reallocate it, resulting in the same inode numbers but with a
reset generation count. This can result in inode/generation
pairs of different inodes occurring relatively close together.
Given that the inode/gen pair makes up the "unique" portion of
an NFS filehandle on XFS, this can result in file handles cached
on clients being seen on the wire from the server but refer to
a different file. This causes .... issues for NFS clients.
Hence we need a unique generation number initialisation for
each inode to prevent reuse of a small portion of the generation
number space. Make this initialiser per-allocation group so
that it is not a single point of contention in the filesystem,
and increment it on every allocation within an AG to reduce the
chance that a generation number is reused for a given inode number
if the inode chunk is deleted and reallocated immediately
afterwards.
Version 3:
o use random32 rather than get_random_int() as cryptographically
secure random numbers are not really necessary here.
Version 2:
o remove persistent per-AGI agi_newinogen field and replace with
randomly generated 32 bit number for each new cluster. This prevents
NFS clients from potentially guessing what the next generation
number is going to be and removes the need for persistent numbers on
disk.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2008-04-28 16:12:57.376445802 +1000
+++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2008-04-28 16:15:04.427919630 +1000
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc(
int version; /* inode version number to use */
int isaligned = 0; /* inode allocation at stripe unit */
/* boundary */
+ unsigned int gen;
args.tp = tp;
args.mp = tp->t_mountp;
@@ -290,6 +291,14 @@ xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc(
else
version = XFS_DINODE_VERSION_1;
+ /*
+ * Seed the new inode cluster with a random generation number. This
+ * prevents short-term reuse of generation numbers if a chunk is
+ * freed and then immediately reallocated. We use random numbers
+ * rather than a linear progression to prevent the next generation
+ * number from easily guessable.
+ */
+ gen = random32();
for (j = 0; j < nbufs; j++) {
/*
* Get the block.
@@ -309,6 +318,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc(
free = XFS_MAKE_IPTR(args.mp, fbuf, i);
free->di_core.di_magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_DINODE_MAGIC);
free->di_core.di_version = version;
+ free->di_core.di_gen = cpu_to_be32(gen);
free->di_next_unlinked = cpu_to_be32(NULLAGINO);
xfs_ialloc_log_di(tp, fbuf, i,
XFS_DI_CORE_BITS | XFS_DI_NEXT_UNLINKED);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 1:58 [PATCH] Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero V2 David Chinner
2008-04-22 4:05 ` Greg Banks
2008-04-22 5:04 ` David Chinner
2008-04-25 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 3:11 ` David Chinner
2008-04-28 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 6:20 ` David Chinner [this message]
2008-04-28 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 3:24 ` Greg Banks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428062032.GI103491721@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=gnb@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox