From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m3UALqt2028684 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:21:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:22:32 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: TAKE 979416 - Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero Message-ID: <20080430102232.GL108924158@sgi.com> References: <20080429004144.757D658C4C15@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <48183AA5.9030804@decisionsoft.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48183AA5.9030804@decisionsoft.co.uk> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Stuart Rowan Cc: David Chinner , sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Stuart Rowan wrote: > Is this liable to affect the stable releases, 2.6.24.y and 2.6.25.y? If so, > is it appropriate for forwarding to the stable team? Yes, and I will do so once we've got .26-rc1 out the door. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group