From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4IDKcRc032372 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:20:40 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 14D947902A1 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id O8364EZOnIWew2YQ for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't Message-ID: <20080518132127.GA19006@infradead.org> References: <20080516222755.3e557c00@galadriel.home> <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The only significant thing I see is that the FS is really close to 16 > > TB of allocated data (15.7TB). I tried mounting it with "inode64" > > option with no more loving. > > Did you remount it with that option as in mount -o remount or did you > completely unmount it and mount it again? Unfortunately none of the > xfs-specific mount options can be reset with remount yet, and it doesn't > return an error either (both are added to my todo list now) Oh, and please post the output of /proc/self/mounts to see if all expected mount options are actualy seen by the filesystem.