From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 19 May 2008 23:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id m4K6A9um027534 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:10:13 -0700 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:10:47 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't Message-ID: <20080520061047.GP103491721@sgi.com> References: <20080516222755.3e557c00@galadriel.home> <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> <20080518132127.GA19006@infradead.org> <20080518154208.77b6be3e@galadriel.home> <20080519221057.75e0a775@galadriel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080519221057.75e0a775@galadriel.home> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:10:57PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200 vous écriviez: > > > IIRC I tried both, however I'll double check monday... > > Well obviously I didn't try both, because it worked as expected when > using "inode64". However there'ssomething slightly weird in the data > layout: > > /dev/dm-0: > AG Inodes IUsed IFree Use% > 0 4288 4277 11 99% > 1 0 0 0 0% > 2 0 0 0 0% ..... If there's no free space in AGs > 0 when you enable inode64, then you will still get enospc... > See how all inodes are in the same vg? is it OK? ^^ AG This is typical of inode32 allocation... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group