From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 20 May 2008 03:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4KAIUhQ029109 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 03:18:32 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3BE53BA0929 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 03:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 66dyOcifpQMGXoze for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 03:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 06:19:18 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS filesystem reports as full though it isn't Message-ID: <20080520101918.GA24579@infradead.org> References: <20080516222755.3e557c00@galadriel.home> <20080518131855.GA1383@infradead.org> <20080518132127.GA19006@infradead.org> <20080518154208.77b6be3e@galadriel.home> <20080519221057.75e0a775@galadriel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080519221057.75e0a775@galadriel.home> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:10:57PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200 vous ?criviez: > > > IIRC I tried both, however I'll double check monday... > > Well obviously I didn't try both, because it worked as expected when > using "inode64". I've submitted a patch that should give back an error when remounting with an option not supported in remount, that should fix this little oversight in the future. Thanks for the report!