From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 22 May 2008 09:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m4MGPFsD024231 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 09:25:16 -0700 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7531C1713612 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 09:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sNjYRsA58GZrf3Pn for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 09:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id m4MGPwF3011108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:25:58 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id m4MGPwG1011106 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 22 May 2008 18:25:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:25:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: xfs_open Message-ID: <20080522162558.GA11036@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Currently xfs_open is only called for regular files, but the only non-trivial code in there is for directories. We probably should wire up an ->open that does the XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN check for directories anyway, but should we bring back the directory readahead? Anyone on this list bored enough to benchmark it?