From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m53KY4vv021652
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:34:07 -0700
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:34:57 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: REVIEW: xfs_reno #2
Message-ID: <20080603203457.GA6018@infradead.org>
References: <op.tznnweh23jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <1204819835.4002.36.camel@tecra.thekeening.homeunix.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1204819835.4002.36.camel@tecra.thekeening.homeunix.org>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>, "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

What happened to xfs xfs_reno patch?  While the swapino functionality
would be nice to have I can't think of a reason to not have the current
code in xfsprogs.