public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete
@ 2008-05-23  4:55 Lachlan McIlroy
  2008-06-18  4:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lachlan McIlroy @ 2008-05-23  4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs-dev, xfs-oss

During a forced shutdown a xfs inode can be destroyed before log
I/O involving that inode is complete.  We need to wait for the
inode to be unpinned before tearing it down.  Version 2 cleans up
the code a bit by relying on xfs_iflush() to do the unpinning and
forced shutdown check.

--- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c_1.504	2008-05-23 11:19:21.000000000 +1000
+++ fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	2008-05-23 11:21:14.000000000 +1000
@@ -3082,8 +3082,6 @@ xfs_iflush(
 	 * flush lock and do nothing.
 	 */
 	if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
-		ASSERT((iip != NULL) ?
-			 !(iip->ili_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) : 1);
 		xfs_ifunlock(ip);
 		return 0;
 	}
--- fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c_1.760	2008-05-22 16:01:09.000000000 +1000
+++ fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c	2008-05-23 11:52:54.000000000 +1000
@@ -3260,7 +3260,6 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
 {
 	xfs_perag_t	*pag = xfs_get_perag(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
 	bhv_vnode_t	*vp = XFS_ITOV_NULL(ip);
-	int		error;
 
 	if (vp && VN_BAD(vp))
 		goto reclaim;
@@ -3303,29 +3302,16 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
 		xfs_iflock(ip);
 	}
 
-	if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
-		if (ip->i_update_core ||
-		    ((ip->i_itemp != NULL) &&
-		     (ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields != 0))) {
-			error = xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode);
-			/*
-			 * If we hit an error, typically because of filesystem
-			 * shutdown, we don't need to let vn_reclaim to know
-			 * because we're gonna reclaim the inode anyway.
-			 */
-			if (error) {
-				xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
-				goto reclaim;
-			}
-			xfs_iflock(ip); /* synchronize with xfs_iflush_done */
-		}
-
-		ASSERT(ip->i_update_core == 0);
-		ASSERT(ip->i_itemp == NULL ||
-		       ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields == 0);
+	/*
+	 * In the case of a forced shutdown we rely on xfs_iflush() to
+	 * wait for the inode to be unpinned before returning an error.
+	 */
+	if (xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode) == 0) {
+		/* synchronize with xfs_iflush_done */
+		xfs_iflock(ip);
+		xfs_ifunlock(ip);
 	}
 
-	xfs_ifunlock(ip);
 	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 
  reclaim:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete
  2008-05-23  4:55 [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete Lachlan McIlroy
@ 2008-06-18  4:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
  2008-06-18  4:30   ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lachlan McIlroy @ 2008-06-18  4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lachlan; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs-oss

ping.

Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> During a forced shutdown a xfs inode can be destroyed before log
> I/O involving that inode is complete.  We need to wait for the
> inode to be unpinned before tearing it down.  Version 2 cleans up
> the code a bit by relying on xfs_iflush() to do the unpinning and
> forced shutdown check.
> 
> --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c_1.504    2008-05-23 11:19:21.000000000 +1000
> +++ fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c    2008-05-23 11:21:14.000000000 +1000
> @@ -3082,8 +3082,6 @@ xfs_iflush(
>      * flush lock and do nothing.
>      */
>     if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
> -        ASSERT((iip != NULL) ?
> -             !(iip->ili_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) : 1);
>         xfs_ifunlock(ip);
>         return 0;
>     }
> --- fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c_1.760    2008-05-22 16:01:09.000000000 +1000
> +++ fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c    2008-05-23 11:52:54.000000000 +1000
> @@ -3260,7 +3260,6 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
> {
>     xfs_perag_t    *pag = xfs_get_perag(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
>     bhv_vnode_t    *vp = XFS_ITOV_NULL(ip);
> -    int        error;
> 
>     if (vp && VN_BAD(vp))
>         goto reclaim;
> @@ -3303,29 +3302,16 @@ xfs_finish_reclaim(
>         xfs_iflock(ip);
>     }
> 
> -    if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
> -        if (ip->i_update_core ||
> -            ((ip->i_itemp != NULL) &&
> -             (ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields != 0))) {
> -            error = xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode);
> -            /*
> -             * If we hit an error, typically because of filesystem
> -             * shutdown, we don't need to let vn_reclaim to know
> -             * because we're gonna reclaim the inode anyway.
> -             */
> -            if (error) {
> -                xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -                goto reclaim;
> -            }
> -            xfs_iflock(ip); /* synchronize with xfs_iflush_done */
> -        }
> -
> -        ASSERT(ip->i_update_core == 0);
> -        ASSERT(ip->i_itemp == NULL ||
> -               ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields == 0);
> +    /*
> +     * In the case of a forced shutdown we rely on xfs_iflush() to
> +     * wait for the inode to be unpinned before returning an error.
> +     */
> +    if (xfs_iflush(ip, sync_mode) == 0) {
> +        /* synchronize with xfs_iflush_done */
> +        xfs_iflock(ip);
> +        xfs_ifunlock(ip);
>     }
> 
> -    xfs_ifunlock(ip);
>     xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> 
>  reclaim:
> 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete
  2008-06-18  4:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
@ 2008-06-18  4:30   ` Dave Chinner
  2008-06-18  6:40     ` Lachlan McIlroy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2008-06-18  4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lachlan McIlroy; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs-oss

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:26:19PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> ping.
>
> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>> During a forced shutdown a xfs inode can be destroyed before log
>> I/O involving that inode is complete.  We need to wait for the
>> inode to be unpinned before tearing it down.  Version 2 cleans up
>> the code a bit by relying on xfs_iflush() to do the unpinning and
>> forced shutdown check.

Sorry I missed this when you first posted it. This one looks ok.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete
  2008-06-18  4:30   ` Dave Chinner
@ 2008-06-18  6:40     ` Lachlan McIlroy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lachlan McIlroy @ 2008-06-18  6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lachlan McIlroy, xfs-dev, xfs-oss

Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:26:19PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>> ping.
>>
>> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>>> During a forced shutdown a xfs inode can be destroyed before log
>>> I/O involving that inode is complete.  We need to wait for the
>>> inode to be unpinned before tearing it down.  Version 2 cleans up
>>> the code a bit by relying on xfs_iflush() to do the unpinning and
>>> forced shutdown check.
> 
> Sorry I missed this when you first posted it. This one looks ok.
> 

Thanks Dave.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-18  6:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-23  4:55 [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim wait for log I/O to complete Lachlan McIlroy
2008-06-18  4:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-06-18  4:30   ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-18  6:40     ` Lachlan McIlroy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox