From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5J8YlgL008399 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:34:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:35:44 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Always reset btree cursor after an insert Message-ID: <20080619083544.GA19606@infradead.org> References: <4859F9EB.5050505@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4859F9EB.5050505@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: xfs-dev , xfs-oss On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 04:17:15PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > After a btree insert operation a cursor can be invalid due to block > splits and a maybe a new root block. We reset the cursor in > xfs_bmbt_insert() in the cases where we think we need to but it > isn't enough as we still see assertions. Just do what we do elsewhere > and reset the cursor unconditionally. Version 2 adds > XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO checks throughout xfs_bmap.c and removes the > fix to revalidate the original cursor in xfs_bmbt_insert(). Can you commit the XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO checks as a separate patch before the cursor reset? ACK from me for those hunks.