From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5RFcbxm027811 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:38:37 -0700 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9C5BF293A56 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LbVCcTEDRgAQC4I7 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id m5RFdSNW031445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:39:28 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id m5RFdSRK031442 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:39:28 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:39:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: rfc: kill ino64 mount option Message-ID: <20080627153928.GA31384@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Does anyone have objections to kill the ino64 mount option? It's purely a debug tool to force inode numbers outside of the range representable in 32bits and is quite invasive for something that could easily be debugged by just having a large enough filesystem..