From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m696FYbP016152 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:15:35 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DA0AD1895742 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id hSF2YTKC78u1HGEY for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:16:21 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature Message-ID: <20080709061621.GA5260@infradead.org> References: <20080630212450t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com> <20080701081026.GB16691@infradead.org> <20080707110730.GG5643@ucw.cz> <20080708231026.GP11558@disturbed> <20080708232031.GE18195@elf.ucw.cz> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: tytso@mit.edu, pavel@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, mtk.manpages@googlemail.com On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same > file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it? It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it.