public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] simplify xfs_setattr
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:29:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080709162914.GA16308@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48747DAD.7060501@sgi.com>

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:58:21PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> > -	if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MTIME_SET | ATTR_ATIME_SET))
> > -		flags |= ATTR_UTIME;
> > -#ifdef ATTR_NO_BLOCK
> > -	if ((ia_valid & ATTR_NO_BLOCK))
> > -		flags |= ATTR_NONBLOCK;
> > -#endif
> > -
> 
> So this code looks different.
> We are now dropping the flags. Why is that?
> Presumably because we were mapping ia_valid's:
>    ATTR_MTIME_SET or ATTR_ATIME_SET --> ATTR_UTIME
>    ATTR_NO_BLOCK -> ATTR_NONBLOCK
> But now we pass ATTR_?TIME_SET and ATTR_NO_BLOCK straight thru.
> So previously we didn't map them onto va_mask bits but as separate flags
> instead.

Yeah, not that ATTR_NO_BLOCK doesn't actually exist in any tree I have
access to, and thus it's not actually handled in the new xfs_setattr.

> So we get rid of the test for XFS_AT_NOSET.
> where:
> #define XFS_AT_NOSET    (XFS_AT_NLINK|XFS_AT_RDEV|XFS_AT_FSID|XFS_AT_NODEID|\
>                 XFS_AT_TYPE|XFS_AT_BLKSIZE|XFS_AT_NBLOCKS|XFS_AT_VCODE|\
>                 XFS_AT_NEXTENTS|XFS_AT_ANEXTENTS|XFS_AT_GENCOUNT)
> 
> I can't see anywhere we set any of these.
> Presumably out of the xattr calls.
> Some left over from IRIX I guess.

Probably.  Note that linux uses the ATTR_ flags only for ->setattr so
there are per defintion none that can't be set.

> #define XFS_AT_UPDATIME         0x00010000
> #define XFS_AT_UPDMTIME         0x00020000
> #define XFS_AT_UPDCTIME         0x00040000
> 3 more not supported by vfs ATTR_* macros.
> I can't see where we set any of these.
> So no loss there I guess.
> Presumably they were just for IRIX.

It's an IRIX leftover.  I will submit a patch to introduce something
similar to Linux for 2.6.27, that's why I'd like these patches in for
2.6.26 so that I have a clean base to start from.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-09 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-27 15:45 [PATCH 2/3] simplify xfs_setattr Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-05 17:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-09  8:58   ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-09 16:29     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-07-11  0:32       ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-11  1:07         ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-11  1:11           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-11  1:10         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080709162914.GA16308@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=tes@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox