From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6FCLk2f000833
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:21:46 -0700
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:22:50 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: xfs bug in 2.6.26-rc9
Message-ID: <20080715122250.GA15744@infradead.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807110939520.30192@uplift.swm.pp.se> <487B019B.9090401@sgi.com> <20080714121332.GX29319@disturbed> <200807151617.58329.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200807151617.58329.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org

> It would be easily possible to do, yes.

What happened to your plans to merge ->nopfn into ->fault?  Beeing
able to restart page based faults would be a logical fallout from that.