From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6NNPt4B005899 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:25:55 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0AA64191E685 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Rvh0gtwUduGTIKxY for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:27:02 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] more vnode related macro cleanups Message-ID: <20080723232702.GP6761@disturbed> References: <20080723194930.GA6188@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080723194930.GA6188@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:49:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > As Dave's cleanups got in so fast (thanks Niv!) I'll give these patches > a spin to. They are all over so I'd love to get them in fast too and > get the leftover bhv_vnode_t bits sorted out ASAP. This series applies on a pristine tree? Not on top of your other changes (like the sanitize init vnode one)? Several of the patches won't apply to my incoming branch because of that. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com