From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6O5NeVP032685 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:23:42 -0700 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 87E24E919CA for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bFhmQhUX2d5We471 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:24:40 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] more vnode related macro cleanups Message-ID: <20080724052440.GA24613@lst.de> References: <20080723194930.GA6188@lst.de> <20080723232702.GP6761@disturbed> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080723232702.GP6761@disturbed> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:27:02AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:49:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > As Dave's cleanups got in so fast (thanks Niv!) I'll give these patches > > a spin to. They are all over so I'd love to get them in fast too and > > get the leftover bhv_vnode_t bits sorted out ASAP. > > This series applies on a pristine tree? Not on top of your > other changes (like the sanitize init vnode one)? Several of > the patches won't apply to my incoming branch because of that. Yes, this applies straight ontop of your patches. Interestingly I only had to rediff '[PATCH] sanitize xfs_initialize_vnode' and the generic ACL patch for these - I expected a lot more.