From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6ONS6Mb017184 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:28:06 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4D88932BB8F for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id O4zOJyOGN4uULBlE for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:29:15 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] add a long pointers flag to xfs_btree_cur Message-ID: <20080724232915.GG15438@disturbed> References: <20080723200853.GG7401@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080723200853.GG7401@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add a flag to the xfs btree cursor when using long (64bit) block pointers > instead of checking btnum == XFS_BTNUM_BMAP. Very sane idea ;) Looks good. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com