From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6P6BioQ020582 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:11:45 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7873732CA78 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Szk4z7Woyxzv1QE9 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:12:50 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: TAKE 981498 - kill xfs_lock_dir_and_entry Message-ID: <20080725061250.GM5947@disturbed> References: <20080725051859.C7093359F6F9@linuxbuild.melbourne.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080725051859.C7093359F6F9@linuxbuild.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Donald Douwsma Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:18:59PM +1000, Donald Douwsma wrote: > kill xfs_lock_dir_and_entry .... > Date: Fri Jul 25 15:14:03 AEST 2008 > Workarea: linuxbuild.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/donaldd/isms/2.6.x-xfs > Inspected by: hch Ah - I think you are dropping the review on all these checkins, Donald. My name should be against that as having reviewed it.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com