From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6Q9LVGQ022054 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:21:31 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BCF00192E6E7 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3JCKth2njDOLV3FG for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:22:38 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] stop using file_update_time Message-ID: <20080726092238.GU5947@disturbed> References: <20080726063339.GC22603@lst.de> <20080726091348.GT5947@disturbed> <20080726091428.GA29710@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080726091428.GA29710@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:14:28AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:13:48PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I don't think you meant to remove the xfs_ichgtime() prototype > > as well... > > Actually I did, but I forgot to mention why. There's a second prototype > in xfs_inode.h which is enough. Ah, ok, so there is. Looks good, then ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com