From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m6U5Xnj1002002 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:33:50 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0957C19531BC for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id i6LbPVNRQmjVx0UG for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:34:55 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] add get_maxrecs btree operation Message-ID: <20080730053455.GO13395@disturbed> References: <20080729193121.GO19104@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080729193121.GO19104@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:31:21PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Factor xfs_btree_maxrecs into a per-btree operation. > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig ->get_maxrecs was extracted out of my original patchset, right? I didn't apply it to removing xfs_btree_maxrecs(), though. Good idea. Looks fine to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com