From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] generic btree implementation, version 3
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:02:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804020226.GA9995@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804015425.GE6119@disturbed>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:54:25AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > With all these changes the stats for this series are now:
> >
> > 37 files changed, 6309 insertions(+), 7873 deletions(-)
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 631577 4227 3092 638896 9bfb0 fs/xfs/xfs.ko.base
> > 614298 4435 3124 621857 97d21 fs/xfs/xfs.ko.btree
>
> FWIW, this aggregate doesn't show the real picture of the savings.
> What is really interesting is how small the individual
> implementations become....
hch@bigmac:~/work/linux-2.6-xfs$ wc -l fs/xfs/xfs{_alloc,_ialloc,_bmap,}_btree.c
409 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
309 fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c
858 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c
3813 fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
5389 total
hch@bigmac:~/work/linux-2.6-xfs$ size
fs/xfs/xfs{_alloc,_ialloc,_bmap,}_btree.o
text data bss dec hex filename
2335 0 4 2339 923 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.o
1589 0 4 1593 639 fs/xfs_ialloc_btree.o
5827 0 4 5831 16c7 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.o
32785 0 4 32789 8015 fs/xfs/xfs_btree.o
In comparism for the old code:
hch@bigmac:~/work/linux-2.6-xfs$ wc -l fs/xfs/xfs{_alloc,_ialloc,_bmap,}_btree.c
2211 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
2078 fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c
2610 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c
914 fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
7813 total
hch@bigmac:~/work/linux-2.6-xfs$ size fs/xfs/xfs{_alloc,_ialloc,_bmap,}_btree.o
text data bss dec hex filename
13383 0 0 13383 3447 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.o
12923 0 0 12923 327b fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.o
28870 22 4 28896 70e0 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.o
7062 0 4 7066 1b9a fs/xfs/xfs_btree.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 1:31 [PATCH 00/26] generic btree implementation, version 3 Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20080804015425.GE6119@disturbed>
2008-08-04 2:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-08-04 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-05 0:26 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-05 0:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080804020226.GA9995@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox