From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/28] XFS: sync and reclaim rework
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:44:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080822014407.GA21740@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080819235920.GK24344@disturbed>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:59:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:16:16PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > Multiple patch sets, all in one patch bomb against a current
> > git tree. This includes all outstanding patches I have previously
> > sent that are not committed plus a bunch more...
>
> A bunch of ppl (including me) have not seen the entire patchset
> come through the list yet [*], so I've tarred up the patch set and
> attached it below.
Thanks, the patches looks good to me modulo the consmetic comments
pointed out on IRC. They also survive xfsqs ontop of my btree patches.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-22 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 13:16 [PATCH 0/28] XFS: sync and reclaim rework Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 01/28] XFS: remove i_gen from incore inode Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 02/28] XFS: move sync code to its own file Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 04/28] XFS: Remove xfs_iflush_all and clean up xfs_finish_reclaim_all() V3 Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 05/28] XFS: Use the inode tree for finding dirty inodes V3 Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 06/28] XFS: Traverse inode trees when releasing dquots V3 Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 08/28] XFS: split out two helpers from xfs_syncsub Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 09/28] XFS: Use struct inodes instead of vnodes to kill vn_grab Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 12/28] XFS: xfssyncd: don't call xfs_sync Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 13/28] XFS: make SYNC_ATTR no longer use xfs_sync Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 14/28] XFS: make SYNC_DELWRI " Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 16/28] XFS: Kill xfs_sync() Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 17/28] XFS: Move remaining quiesce code Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 20/28] XFS: Never call mark_inode_dirty_sync() directly Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 21/28] Inode: Allow external initialisers Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 23/28] XFS: Combine the XFS and Linux inodes Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 24/28] XFS: move inode reclaim functions to xfs_sync.c Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 25/28] XFS: mark inodes for reclaim via a tag in the inode radix tree Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 26/28] XFS: rename inode reclaim functions Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 23:11 ` [PATCH 0/28] XFS: sync and reclaim rework Mark Goodwin
2008-08-19 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-19 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-22 1:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080822014407.GA21740@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox