public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW #2]  Update kernel code to compile in userspace (libxfs)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:59:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080901015950.GA16825@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.ugr4zpyv3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:56:03AM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:11:20 +1000, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 05:59:43PM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:00:56 +1000, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@sgi.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mostly header changes associated with #ifdef __KERNEL__ stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Some function prototypes had to be reordered to separate
>>>> shared and kernel only functions.
>>>
>>> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h patch looked pretty horrid (and there was a missing
>>> declaration), here's a better version:
>>
>> I still don't like it very much :)  What about just moving the
>> xfs_ictimestamp and xfs_icdinode defintions next to the ifork
>> so that we can save one ifdef __KERNEL__?  Also might be worth
>> to move the xfs_iflock & co inlines before the end of that __KERNEL__
>> block to save another ifdef.
>
> Ok, this now only has one blob of #ifdef __KERNEL__ in it now:

Looks good.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-01  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-29  7:00 [REVIEW #2] Update kernel code to compile in userspace (libxfs) Barry Naujok
2008-08-29  7:59 ` Barry Naujok
2008-08-29 18:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-01  1:56     ` Barry Naujok
2008-09-01  1:59       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-09-01  2:06         ` Barry Naujok
2008-09-01  2:08           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-01  4:55             ` Barry Naujok
2008-09-01  5:00               ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080901015950.GA16825@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bnaujok@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox