From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m8K6xvif008821 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:59:57 -0700 Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8C29210715A1 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nNy3fZoG01zfHZmq for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:01:26 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unlock inode before calling xfs_idestroy() Message-ID: <20080920070126.GQ5811@disturbed> References: <48D3193C.6060201@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48D3193C.6060201@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: xfs-oss , xfs-dev On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:15:08PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Lock debugging reported the ilock was being destroyed > without being unlocked. Is this going to go in before or after my changes to refactor this function? If it is before< can you please push it out to the master git tree ASAP (and all the other outstanding changes) so I can rediff all the outstanding patches I have before I send them again? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com