From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m8O7iY2Z001249 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:44:34 -0700 Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DC862475DF8 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.57]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TTtSKWzdEX2Ud7ju for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:46:04 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Use atomic_t and wait_event to track dquot pincount Message-ID: <20080924074604.GK5448@disturbed> References: <48D9C1DD.6030607@sgi.com> <48D9EB8F.1070104@sgi.com> <48D9EF6E.8010505@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48D9EF6E.8010505@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: Peter Leckie , xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-dev@sgi.com On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:42:38PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Looks good Pete. No, it is not yet good. Pete cannot explain the underlying problem and we need to understand if this is fixing the problem or just changing the timing so it doesn't show up.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com