From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] XFS: replace fixed size busy extent array with an rbtree
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:49:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081008184928.GB6823@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223417377-8679-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
> @@ -131,14 +131,8 @@ STATIC void
> xfs_free_perag(
> xfs_mount_t *mp)
> {
> - if (mp->m_perag) {
> - int agno;
> -
> - for (agno = 0; agno < mp->m_maxagi; agno++)
> - if (mp->m_perag[agno].pagb_list)
> - kmem_free(mp->m_perag[agno].pagb_list);
> + if (mp->m_perag)
> kmem_free(mp->m_perag);
> - }
kmem_free(NULL) is fine, so no need for the if. And with that there's
no need for this one-line wrapper and we can just do the free in the
caller.
> typedef struct xfs_log_busy_slot {
> - xfs_agnumber_t lbc_ag;
> - ushort lbc_idx; /* index in perag.busy[] */
> + struct xfs_busy_extent *lbc_busyp;
> } xfs_log_busy_slot_t;
Just use xfs_busy_extent directly - there's only about a handful places
using xfs_log_busy_slot anyway.
> xfs_log_busy_slot_t *
> -xfs_trans_add_busy(xfs_trans_t *tp, xfs_agnumber_t ag, xfs_extlen_t idx)
> +xfs_trans_add_busy(
> + xfs_trans_t *tp,
> + struct xfs_busy_extent *busyp)
And this one can lose it's return value. It's always the second
argmument and ignored by all callers anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 22:09 [RFC, PATCH 0/7] XFS: dynamic busy extent tracking Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] XFS: rename xfs_get_perag Dave Chinner
2008-10-08 18:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] XFS: replace fixed size busy extent array with an rbtree Dave Chinner
2008-10-08 18:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-10-09 0:06 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] XFS: Don't immediately reallocate busy extents Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] XFS: Don't use log forces when busy extents are allocated Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] XFS: Do not classify freed allocation btree blocks as busy Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] XFS: Avoid busy extent ranges rather than the entire extent Dave Chinner
2008-10-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] XFS: Simplify transaction busy extent tracking Dave Chinner
2008-10-09 18:17 ` [RFC, PATCH 0/7] XFS: dynamic " Martin Steigerwald
2008-10-09 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-10 7:11 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081008184928.GB6823@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox