From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Re-dirty pages on ENOSPC when converting delayed allocations
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:48:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081009224832.GK9597@disturbed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081009122726.GH9597@disturbed>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:27:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:15:57PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > If we get an error in xfs_page_state_convert() - and it's not EAGAIN - then
> > we throw away the dirty page without converting the delayed allocation. This
> > leaves delayed allocations that can never be removed and confuses code that
> > expects a flush of the file to clear them. We need to re-dirty the page on
> > error so we can try again later or report that the flush failed.
>
> Actually, those delalloc pages can be removed - they just need to
> be handled in ->releasepage. The problem there is that the
> delalloc state is checked by looking at the bufferhead, and by
> the time we get to ->releasepage the buffer heads have already gone
> through discard_buffer() and lost the buffer_delay() flag.
>
> IIRC I had a patch that did the delalloc conversion correctly in
> ->releasepage by utilising a custom ->invalidatepage callouut, but
> the performance overhead was very bad because it is done a page at a
> time. ISTR even posting it to oss....
FWIW, here's the discussion:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00542.html
I'm not saying that we ѕhould be fixing this right now, but this
is the underlying problem that is causing the direct I/O read
to trip over stale delalloc extents once they've been invalidated.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-09 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-07 8:15 [PATCH V2] Re-dirty pages on ENOSPC when converting delayed allocations Lachlan McIlroy
2008-10-09 12:27 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-09 22:48 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2008-10-10 7:45 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-11-12 6:48 ` Mark Goodwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081009224832.GK9597@disturbed \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=lachlan@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox