From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9A0g2FJ010308 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:42:03 -0700 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E7288129DE74 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id REfurvFMKP4wqQSC for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:43:36 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection Message-ID: <20081010004336.GA22273@lst.de> References: <20081009130042.GA21071@lst.de> <20081009223534.GJ9597@disturbed> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081009223534.GJ9597@disturbed> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, toei.rei@stargazer.at On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:35:34AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Looks good. Should this be sent straight to Linus to get it into > .27? If you want to do that, you can add my SOB. I'll hope Lachlan or Tim as maintainers will pick up..