From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9A9M0MK030193
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:22:00 -0700
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:23:34 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix barrier fail detection
Message-ID: <20081010092334.GA15797@lst.de>
References: <20081009130042.GA21071@lst.de> <48EEAC1A.2080309@sgi.com> <48EED73F.1010208@sgi.com> <20081010042732.GC8181@disturbed>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081010042732.GC8181@disturbed>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, xfs@oss.sgi.com, toei.rei@stargazer.at

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:27:32PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:17:03PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> > Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> .....
> > > Actually, probably need to update the comment for this one.
> .....
> 
> > i.e. something like:
> 
> Looks fine to me.

Yeah, looks good.