From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9F2caEB011180 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:38:36 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:40:15 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: TAKE 988141 - Fix build error - use VFS_I() to access linux inode from xfs inode Message-ID: <20081015024014.GA21790@infradead.org> References: <20081015021055.6B76358FA1E9@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20081015022106.GA22939@infradead.org> <48F5654E.3080900@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48F5654E.3080900@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:36:46PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Sorry Christoph. I just don't have time to read all posts. > > I expect fixes to be in the same patch series that breaks the code - it > didn't occur to me to go looking for a fix on OSS. Well, Daven unfortunately can't be bothered to use the same tree as everyone else. But I made it pretty clear in the patch that it is needed for the series when using a ptools/cvs style tree, and that it's harmless to apply it ASAP even without those bits.