From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9GMsVi1032390 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:54:34 -0700 Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 55AB15090AC for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9qcctk6emprpH8N7 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:56:11 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: BUG: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel in 2.6.27 Message-ID: <20081016225611.GC31761@disturbed> References: <20081009113610.F13062@moloch.hellmouth.net> <20081009230227.GL9597@disturbed> <20081016151752.F30919@moloch.hellmouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20081016151752.F30919@moloch.hellmouth.net> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Sean Purdy Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:17:52PM +0100, Sean Purdy wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Dave Chinner said: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Sean Purdy wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Further to the discussion (and patching) of an xfs_trans_cancel > > > issue in June, in kernel < 2.6.26 > > > > > > A similar issue came up on one disk of a 4 x 750GiB machine > > > with a 2.6.24 kernel. So I installed 2.6.27-6 and gave it another try. > > > But I'm still seeing the same problem. Remounting the drive each time > > > is fine, and xfs_check shows no errors. > > > > 2.6.27-6? You mean 2.6.27-rc6? > > I meant rc9 as it happens, but never mind. > > > Anyway, you need to try this patch: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00105.html > > > > which I posted a few days ago that fixes the latest reproducable > > case of this shutdown that I know of. > > This patch worked fine, thanks very much! Great. It's good to know that mutliple people إve been hitting this specific problem. > Can we get it into > some stable version of 2.6.27? Maybe I can put in a bug request > for the next Ubuntu kernel. We haven't pushed it upstream for .28-rc1 yet as it is still being QA'd. Once it is pushed we can consider it for .27-stable. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com