From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9HKrLpV002492 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:53:22 -0700 Received: from casper.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B08EF10ABCF2 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zbOv6ptIimYiyrYN for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:55:10 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) Message-ID: <20081017135510.7127c4e7@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20081017203710.GA27187@infradead.org> References: <20081017164116.GA17375@infradead.org> <20081017165738.GA20818@infradead.org> <20081017203710.GA27187@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Alexander Beregalov , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:37:10 -0400 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I just ran the xfs testsuite over linux-next on qemu (i386), and I > can't find anything at all. Really strange. Let's see if this still > there with mondays linux-next, and if yes can you just try the xfs > patch from the splitout linux-next patches and see if that alone > causes it? > > In fact that might be useful for todays linux-next, too. > -- also if you enable lockdep, it tracks where irq's got turned off (with a stacktrace I think) so it would provide some good clues. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org