From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9KGVivU001373 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:31:46 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D978610B1140 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Y2NgTxhFi5UFljeO for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:33:27 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) Message-ID: <20081020163327.GA15651@infradead.org> References: <20081017164116.GA17375@infradead.org> <20081017165738.GA20818@infradead.org> <20081017203710.GA27187@infradead.org> <20081017135510.7127c4e7@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:58:09PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > Hi Christoph > > I have the same result with next-1020 and today's xfs-2.6.git/master > ( > commit bfd2bd10da76378dc4afd87d7d204a1d3d70b347 > Author: David Chinner > Date: Fri Oct 17 15:36:23 2008 +1000 > Inode: Allow external list initialisation > ) > > Should I start bisecting? That would be extremely helpful! And as mentioned in the other mail I still can't reproduce it, but I can currently only test on x86-32, not x86-64.